The Utility of Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society
Search

Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society

University: University of Manchester

  • Unit No: N/A
  • Level: High school
  • Pages: 17 / Words 4301
  • Paper Type: Case Study
  • Course Code: POLI10301
  • Downloads: 362

INTRODUCTION

The UK and Germany are two important and powerful nations of Europe. In the present research study, a detailed investigation is done on the attitude or trust that the people of the UK and Germany have in the political institutions like political parties, politicians, judiciary, parliament, police, EU parliament, and UNO. In this regard, the descriptive analysis method and T-test are used to find out whether there is a significant difference between varied groups across both nations. At the end of the report, a conclusion section is prepared wherein the entire results are discussed and the reasons behind the obtained results are also discussed. Apart from this, the way further study can be carried out on the basis of obtained results is also explained. In this way, the entire research work is carried out.

Data

In the present research study main aim is to identify the level of trust people have in political institutions across different nations. In the political institutions, multiple organizations come like the country's parliament, legal system, police, politicians, political parties, EU parliament, and United Nations organizations. In the data set two international organizations are used namely EU Parliament and United Nations Organizations. In all these variables data set used is a nominal or categorical variable. The nominal variable refers to the type of data where labeling of quantitative elements is done like gender in male and female. The country variable is also nominal in nature. The sample size is vast as data is collected from 16324 people from eight nations of the EU namely the UK, Germany, France, Spain, Italy, Sweden, Poland, and Hungary. The variables discussed above in terms of data type are used to operationalize the concept and to test the hypothesis.  Totally there are nine variables in the entire analysis process that are used for analysis purposes and to arrive at specific conclusions. It can be said that the scope of the study is wide.

Pay to Get Your Assignment Done On Time !

Order Now

Results

Trust in Parliament 

The graph given above with respect to trust in the country's parliament indicates that in the UK there is no trust of people in the mentioned institute. As can be seen, the red bar is high, and after that bar declines consistently. On the other hand, the bar increases before the red bar. This clearly reflects that a large number of people have no or moderate trust in Parliament. In the case of Germany also same trend is observed. Thus, it can be said that in both nations people have no or moderate trust in parliament.

In respect to the legal system case is different as it can be seen from the chart given above that the blue bar consistent elevation in the bar and the blue one is the 8th number which is nearby to complete trust. It can be assumed that the majority of UK citizens believed in or had trust in the legal system. In the case of Germany, the same thing is also observed. Thus, it can be assumed that people have a belief in the judiciary system of their nation.

Trust in police

In the case of the police high level of trust is seen in the legal system and parliament. A large number of people trust in the UK police. On this front different trend is seen in Germany as relative to the UK in the mentioned nation large number of people trust on police.

Trust in Politicians

The chart indicates that people do not believe in politicians in large numbers in the UK. In Germany also, the same thing is observed. Thus, politicians are part of the system that leads people and plays a role in the nation's growth but they have no trust in the eye of the general public.

Trust in Political Parties 

The chart indicates that people do not believe in political parties in large numbers in the UK. In Germany also, the same thing is observed. Thus, political parties are one of the parts of the system that lead people and play a role in the nation's growth but those have no trust in the eye of the general public.

Trust in the European Parliament 

The graph given above with respect to trust in the EU parliament indicates that in the UK there is less trust in people in the mentioned institute. As can be seen, the red bar is high, and after that bar declines consistently. On the other hand, the bar increases before the red bar. This clearly reflects that a large number of people have no or moderate trust on the EU parliament. In the case of Germany also same trend is observed. Thus, it can be said that in both nations people have no or moderate trust in the EU parliament.

Trust in the United Nations 

A moderate number of people have trust in the United Nations organization in the UK. There are less number of people in the complete and less trust category. In the case of Germany also same trend is seen and people have moderate trust in UNO.

T-test results

In the t-test significant differences are observed between UK and Germany in the case of parliament (p = 0.001<0.05), police (p = 0.00<0.05), and UNO (p = 0.004<0.05). On the other hand, a significant difference between both nations is not observed in the case of legal systems (p = 0.896<0.05), politicians (p = 0.660<0.05), political parties (p = 0.397<0.05), and EU parliament (p = 0.559<0.05).

In the case of trust in the country parliament for the UK (M = 5.59, SD = 8.78) and for Germany (M = 6.58, SD = 10.75) which reflects that both nations' citizen has moderate and high trust in the country parliament. On the other hand, in the case of variable trust in the legal system in the UK (M = 6.80, SD = 8.65) and for Germany (M = 6.77, SD = 8.06) it indicates that both country citizen has moderate trust in legal system of their country. In the case of trust in police for the UK (M = 6.72, SD = 3.07) and Germany (M = 7.38, SD = 5.14) it reflects that both nation's citizen has moderate trust in their national police. Apart from this, with respect to variable trust in politicians in the UK (M = 4.68, SD = 8.95) and Germany (M = 4.58, SD = 6.76) which indicates that both countries' citizen has very low or no trust in politicians of their country.

In the case of trust in political parties for the UK (M = 5.09, SD = 10.30) and for Germany (M = 5.35, SD = 10.19) which reflects that both nation's citizen has less trust in the country's political parties. On the other hand, in the case of variable trust in the EU parliament in the UK (M = 7.46, SD = 17.39) and Germany (M = 7.75, SD = 16.55) which indicates that both countries' citizen has moderate trust in EU parliament. In the case of the United Nations the UK (M = 10.25, SD = 19.64) and Germany is (M = 8.67, SD = 17.64) which reflects that both nation's citizen has very high or complete trust on the UNO.

CONCLUSION

Trust level with respect to the country's parliament and police is quite different in the UK and Germany. This indicates that conditions in both nations are quite different with respect to the trust level people have in both. The reason behind this may be measures taken by political parties in the past couple of years to come out of the recession or welfare measures. In Germany, people trust parliament more than the UK and the reason behind this may be that the UK does not have strong leadership like Germany where Angela Merkel successfully ran the government and satisfied people's needs to the maximum possible extent. With respect to trust in police in Germany, people trust them more mentioned institute the UK. However, in respect to the United Nations scene is different and people more trust more on it in the UK than in Germany. It can be said that with respect to trust people of Germany believe more in parliament and the police than the UK people. In respect to the United Nations also both nations, people trust at different levels (Valeriani and Vaccari, 2016). On the basis of the obtained results, it is identified that people in both the UK and Germany have less trust in the political institutions. It is clear that in both nations people completely trust on police, legal system, and United Nations as well as EU parliament. This means that people in both the UK and Germany do not trust political leaders, political parties, and parliament. This is because leaders are always engaged in blaming each other over varied issues. These parties follow a pattern under which if the ruling party brings any proposal opponent will definitely oppose that as they believe that opposing any bill brought by the ruling party is their main responsibility. Due to this reason, both entities remain opposite to each other and always keep on fighting against each other. This led to the loss of trust of political leaders and political parties among the people. People have a common belief that politicians do not work in the interest of the public, as they always like to show themselves in the limelight. The double standard shown by political parties is another big reason behind people's responses. On the same topic, these politicians give different responses in different years. This is the reason why people lose confidence in political parties and politicians.

However, results indicate that in the UK and Germany, people have a belief in the legal system and police. The judiciary plays a very active and positive role in both nations (Fitzgerald and Wolak, 2016). They take time but make accurate decisions which is always welcome by the people. This is indicated by the moderate mean value in the above section. Police, people believe a lot because they take cases very seriously and whole night, because of which people feel safe at the workplace. This is the reason why they believe a lot in the judiciary system and police.

We Promise Exceptional Assignment Writing & No AI Shortcuts !

It is also observed in the analysis of the fact that people greatly trust the EU parliament. This is because it is the parliament of the entire Europe and works for the benefit of the entire member countries. If the EU parliament does not work properly then in that case all its member states will be affected as their economy is integrated to each other and the currency is also the same. Such kind of valid logic develops trust among the employees of the business firm. Hence, it can be said that people do not trust their parliament, politicians, and political leaders but have full trust in the EU parliament.

People greatly trust the United Nations organization because it works a lot for the benefit of the world. The mentioned organization sends peace-keeping forces to the nations where there is high unrest. In case any nation faces natural calamity then in that case also UNO takes care of the nation and makes available every kind of facility so that more and more lives can be saved in such kind of disastrous conditions.

Current political phenomena are affecting both the UK and Germany a lot. This is because in the UK people vote in support of BREXIT. Political parties were both in support and against BREXIT (Kroknes, Jakobsen. and Grønning, 2015. Now people pass BREXIT but the UK is trying to identify ways in which it can successfully leave the European Union. In this regard, formalities are done. Many people believe that because of BREXIT economic condition of the nation may be greatly affected as tourism may reduce because of changes in rules and regulations in the nation. Rules become stricter than before which may negatively affect tourism in the UK. Political phenomena are also affecting Germany as in the mentioned nation foreigners are adopting extremism and performing violent activity. Such kind of things are not good for Germany (Erisen and Kentmen-Cin, 2017). Thus, it can be said that political phenomena are affecting both nations. This analysis can be further expanded by asking questions to the people about political parties, politicians, and parliament working and their thoughts. By doing so exact reasons can be identified that are responsible for the less trust of the people in political parties, politicians, and parliament.    

REFERENCES

Books and Journals

Erisen, C. and Kentmen-Cin, C., 2017. Tolerance and perceived threat toward Muslim immigrants in Germany and the Netherlands. European Union Politics. 18(1). pp.73-97.

Fitzgerald, J. and Wolak, J., 2016. The Roots of trust in local government in western Europe. International Political Science Review. 37(1). pp.130-146.

Kroknes, V.F., Jakobsen, T.G. and Grønning, L.M., 2015. Economic Performance and Political Trust: The impact of the financial crisis on European citizens. European Societies. 17(5). pp.700-723.

Valeriani, A. and Vaccari, C., 2016. Accidental exposure to politics on social media as an online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. New Media & Society. 18(9). pp.1857-1874.

APPENDIX

Descriptive Statistics

 

N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Trust in the country's parliament

1959

.00

88.00

5.5905

8.78166

Trust in the legal system

1959

.00

88.00

6.8092

8.65706

Trust in the police

1959

.00

88.00

6.7241

3.07659

Trust in politicians

1959

.00

88.00

4.6857

8.95528

Trust in political parties

1959

.00

88.00

5.0988

10.30058

Trust in the European Parliament

1959

.00

88.00

7.4654

17.39463

Trust in the United Nations

1959

.00

88.00

10.2588

19.64501

Valid N (listwise)

1959

 

 

 

 

a. Country = United Kingdom

 

Descriptive Statistics

 

N

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

Trust in the country's parliament

2852

.00

88.00

6.5865

10.75699

Trust in the legal system

2852

.00

88.00

6.7772

8.06317

Trust in the police

2852

.00

88.00

7.3813

5.14420

Trust in politicians

2852

.00

88.00

4.5858

6.76874

Trust in political parties

2852

.00

88.00

5.3533

10.19075

Trust in the European Parliament

2852

.00

88.00

7.7551

16.55923

Trust in the United Nations

2852

.00

88.00

8.6791

17.64980

Valid N (listwise)

2852

 

 

 

 

a. Country = Germany

 

Group Statistics

 

Country

N

Mean

Std. Deviation

Std. Error Mean

Trust in the country's parliament

United Kingdom

1959

5.5905

8.78166

.19841

Germany

2852

6.5865

10.75699

.20143

Trust in the legal system

United Kingdom

1959

6.8092

8.65706

.19559

Germany

2852

6.7772

8.06317

.15098

Trust in the police

United Kingdom

1959

6.7241

3.07659

.06951

Germany

2852

7.3813

5.14420

.09633

Trust in politicians

United Kingdom

1959

4.6857

8.95528

.20233

Germany

2852

4.5858

6.76874

.12675

Trust in political parties

United Kingdom

1959

5.0988

10.30058

.23273

Germany

2852

5.3533

10.19075

.19082

Trust in the European Parliament

United Kingdom

1959

7.4654

17.39463

.39300

Germany

2852

7.7551

16.55923

.31007

Trust in the United Nations

United Kingdom

1959

10.2588

19.64501

.44385

Germany

2852

8.6791

17.64980

.33050

 

Independent Samples Test

 

Levene's Test for Equality of Variances

t-test for Equality of Means

F

Sig.

t

df

Sig. (2-tailed)

Mean Difference

Std. Error Difference

95% Confidence Interval of the Difference

Lower

Upper

Trust in the country's parliament

Equal variances assumed

5.874

.015

-3.394

4809

.001

-.99599

.29344

-1.57127

-.42071

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

-3.523

4668.284

.000

-.99599

.28273

-1.55028

-.44170

Trust in the legal system

Equal variances assumed

.113

.737

.131

4809

.896

.03197

.24386

-.44609

.51004

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

.129

4009.054

.897

.03197

.24709

-.45246

.51640

Trust in the police

Equal variances assumed

1.661

.198

-5.066

4809

.000

-.65718

.12972

-.91149

-.40286

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

-5.532

4726.951

.000

-.65718

.11879

-.89005

-.42430

Trust in politicians

Equal variances assumed

4.776

.029

.440

4809

.660

.09995

.22695

-.34497

.54487

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

.419

3433.124

.676

.09995

.23875

-.36816

.56806

Trust in political parties

Equal variances assumed

.018

.892

-.847

4809

.397

-.25449

.30036

-.84333

.33435

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

-.846

4178.648

.398

-.25449

.30096

-.84453

.33554

Trust in the European Parliament

Equal variances assumed

1.608

.205

-.584

4809

.559

-.28974

.49605

-1.26222

.68275

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

-.579

4071.010

.563

-.28974

.50060

-1.27118

.69171

Trust in the United Nations

Equal variances assumed

13.556

.000

2.912

4809

.004

1.57968

.54252

.51609

2.64328

Equal variances not assumed

 

 

2.855

3906.395

.004

1.57968

.55338

.49474

2.66462

 

Need Personalised Assistance from Our Experts?

Share Your Requirements via Whatsapp!

Chat Now

Have trouble finishing your assignments? Get professional assignment help for students in the UK. Excellent marks are guaranteed by professional writers, fresh content, and timely submission. With just a single click, you can begin attaining academic excellence!

 

Download Full Sample
Cite This Work To export references to this Sample, select the desired referencing style below:
Assignment Desk.(2024) Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society Retrieved from: https://www.assignmentdesk.co.uk/free-samples/politics/political-institution-trust-in-contemporary-society
Copy to Clipboard
Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society Assignment Desk ,(2024),https://www.assignmentdesk.co.uk/free-samples/politics/political-institution-trust-in-contemporary-society
Copy to Clipboard
Assignment Desk (2024) Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society[Online]. Retrieved from: https://www.assignmentdesk.co.uk/free-samples/politics/political-institution-trust-in-contemporary-society
Copy to Clipboard
Assignment Desk Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society. (Assignment Desk, 2024) https://www.assignmentdesk.co.uk/free-samples/politics/political-institution-trust-in-contemporary-society
Copy to Clipboard
Assignment Desk Political Institution Trust in Contemporary Society. [Internet]. Assignment Desk.(2024), Retrieved from: https://www.assignmentdesk.co.uk/free-samples/politics/political-institution-trust-in-contemporary-society
Copy to Clipboard
Struggling with writing assignments? Take our academic writing services to resolve your problems. We not only provide online assignment help but also various other services like thesis, dissertation, and essay writing services. If you have any doubts about our experts, then we suggest you check our “Samples” before seeking master dissertation help from us. Our experts can ease the complexity of your work. All you have to do is ask, “Can you do my assignment?”
Boost Grades & Leave Stress

Share Your Requirements Now for Customized Solutions.

Lowest Price
USD 6.27

    Delivered on-time or your money back

    100+ Qualified Writers

    For Best Politics Assignment Help

    View All Writers
    FREE Tools

    To Make Your Work Original

    • tools Paraphrasing Tool

      Check your work against paraphrasing & get a free Plagiarism report!

      Check Paraphrasing
    • tools Plagiarism Checker

      Check your work against plagiarism & get a free Plagiarism report!

      Check Plagiarism
    • tools Dissertation Outline Generator

      Quick and Simple Tool to Generate Dissertation Outline Instantly

      Dissertation Outline Generator
    • tools Grammar Checker Tool

      Make your content free of errors in just a few clicks for free!

      Grammar Checker
    • tools Essay Typer

      Generate plagiarism-free essays as per your topic’s requirement!

      Essay Typer
    • tools Thesis Statement Generator

      Generate a Compelling Thesis Statement and Impress Your Professor

      Try Thesis Generator Tool

    Professional Academic Help at Pocket-Friendly Prices!

    Captcha Code refresh

        Estimated Price

        USD 6.6 25% OFF
        Total Price USD 6.27
        182532+Delivered Orders 4500+PhD Writers 4.8/5Client Rating

         
        AD whatsapp

        Limited Time Offer

        Exclusive Library Membership + FREE Wallet Balance